Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From Wikicarpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Delete manual and moved to "help".)
Tag: Blanking
(Added some initial notes (kept some in comments until final edit))
Line 1: Line 1:
== Main page structure ==


My high level suggestion for C1/C2 is groping:
* Base game (by HiG)
* Major Expansions (by HiG)
* Minor Expansions (by HiG)
* Minor expansions by others (Spiel Doch, Spiel Box and other events,...)
Don't see any problem either in grouping spin-offs in separate pages following the idea of Winter Edition.
--[[User:Meepledrone|Meepledrone]] ([[User talk:Meepledrone|talk]]) 14:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
(To be completed by Sinscerly)
== Expansion naming ==
I've come across several discrepancies in the text that I would like to discuss in order to see if we agree any action upon them. Some may come from the source material (the CAR mainly). This entry is about Expansion naming.
For some expansions we are using names that differ from the "official" ones used by the English publishers. We have some differences in capitalization, the use of And vs. &, and other cases. I included some examples comparing with ZMG:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Oficial Name || Wikicarpedia name
|-
| Inns & Cathedrals || Inns and Cathedrals
|-
| Traders & Builders || Traders and Builders
|-
| The Princess & The Dragon || The Princess and the Dragon
|-
| Abbey & Mayor || Abbey and the Mayor
|-
| Count, King & Robber || Count, King and Robber
|-
| Under The Big Top || Under the Big Top
|-
| The Flying Machines || The Flier (Flying Machines)
|-
| The Messengers || Messages, The (Dispatches)
|-
| The Gold Mines || The Goldmaines
|-
| Mage & Witch || Mage and Witch
|-
| The Crop Circles || Crop Circles
|}
Suggestion:
* Using the publisher-given name and stick to it when available.
* Verify if some other name has to be updated, checking references to translations for German.
--[[User:Meepledrone|Meepledrone]] ([[User talk:Meepledrone|talk]]) 14:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
== Cross-references to Expansions/Base game ==
I've come across several discrepancies in the text that I would like to discuss in order to see if we agree any action upon them. This entry is about cross-references between Expansions.
The CAR original text shows cross-refereces to Expansions in italics generally in the text but not always in footnotes.
Suggestion:
* Use a link in bold to provide a navigable cross-reference that stands out from the text.
Example:
<pre> Lorem ipsum '''[[The Expansion|The Expansion]]''' blah blah blah</pre>
Lorem ipsum '''[[The Expansion|The Expansion]]''' blah blah blah
--[[User:Meepledrone|Meepledrone]] ([[User talk:Meepledrone|talk]]) 14:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
== Self-references to a Expansions/Base game ==
I've come across several discrepancies in the text that I would like to discuss in order to see if we agree any action upon them. This entry is about self-references in a page.
The CAR original text shows self-refereces to Expansions capitalized.
Suggestion:
* Use a link in bold to provide a navigable cross-reference that stands out from the text. In case of transcluded page, it MediaWiki will render a link in bold, otherwise name in bold as is.
Example:
<pre> Lorem ipsum '''[[Link to Self|Link to Self]]''' blah blah blah</pre>
Lorem ipsum '''Link to Self|Link to Self''' blah blah blah
--[[User:Meepledrone|Meepledrone]] ([[User talk:Meepledrone|talk]]) 14:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
<!--
== Naming figures and features ==
I've come across several discrepancies in the text that I would like to discuss in order to see if we agree any action upon them. This entry is about naming figures and features.
The CAR refers to the figures and features in lowercase or capitalized indistictively. For example: hill vs Hill.
* Capitalizing or not figures and/of features
I've come across several in the source material (the CAR mainly) that we could address in a revision of the text:
* References to Publishers
** Include original German names?
** Case: King, Robber and Consort
* Naming consistency in C1:
  * cloister vs. monastery
  * Thief vs. highwayman
  * pennant vs. coat of arms
* References to the Abbot/Gingerbread Man in C1 expansions
-->

Revision as of 16:50, 31 October 2018

Main page structure

My high level suggestion for C1/C2 is groping:

  • Base game (by HiG)
  • Major Expansions (by HiG)
  • Minor Expansions (by HiG)
  • Minor expansions by others (Spiel Doch, Spiel Box and other events,...)

Don't see any problem either in grouping spin-offs in separate pages following the idea of Winter Edition.

--Meepledrone (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

(To be completed by Sinscerly)

Expansion naming

I've come across several discrepancies in the text that I would like to discuss in order to see if we agree any action upon them. Some may come from the source material (the CAR mainly). This entry is about Expansion naming.

For some expansions we are using names that differ from the "official" ones used by the English publishers. We have some differences in capitalization, the use of And vs. &, and other cases. I included some examples comparing with ZMG:

Oficial Name Wikicarpedia name
Inns & Cathedrals Inns and Cathedrals
Traders & Builders Traders and Builders
The Princess & The Dragon The Princess and the Dragon
Abbey & Mayor Abbey and the Mayor
Count, King & Robber Count, King and Robber
Under The Big Top Under the Big Top
The Flying Machines The Flier (Flying Machines)
The Messengers Messages, The (Dispatches)
The Gold Mines The Goldmaines
Mage & Witch Mage and Witch
The Crop Circles Crop Circles

Suggestion:

  • Using the publisher-given name and stick to it when available.
  • Verify if some other name has to be updated, checking references to translations for German.


--Meepledrone (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Cross-references to Expansions/Base game

I've come across several discrepancies in the text that I would like to discuss in order to see if we agree any action upon them. This entry is about cross-references between Expansions.

The CAR original text shows cross-refereces to Expansions in italics generally in the text but not always in footnotes.

Suggestion:

  • Use a link in bold to provide a navigable cross-reference that stands out from the text.

Example:

 Lorem ipsum '''[[The Expansion|The Expansion]]''' blah blah blah

Lorem ipsum The Expansion blah blah blah


--Meepledrone (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Self-references to a Expansions/Base game

I've come across several discrepancies in the text that I would like to discuss in order to see if we agree any action upon them. This entry is about self-references in a page.

The CAR original text shows self-refereces to Expansions capitalized.

Suggestion:

  • Use a link in bold to provide a navigable cross-reference that stands out from the text. In case of transcluded page, it MediaWiki will render a link in bold, otherwise name in bold as is.

Example:

 Lorem ipsum '''[[Link to Self|Link to Self]]''' blah blah blah

Lorem ipsum Link to Self|Link to Self blah blah blah


--Meepledrone (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)